NetComposites Ltd has transferred the rights and ownership of this website to Gardner Business Media Inc.
On 1st January 2020, NetComposites' media assets including netcomposites.com, newsletters and conferences were transferred to Composites World (Gardner Business Media).
This site is no longer being updated. Please direct all enquiries to email@example.com.
For further details see our joint press release.
Vistasp Karbhari, a professor of structural engineering at UC San Diego, has assessed fibre-reinforced polymer composites for dental bridges.
In a paper scheduled for publication in Dental Materials, Karbhari and Howard Strassler, a professor and director of Operative Dentistry at the University of Maryland Dental School, report the results of detailed engineering tests on dental composites containing glass and polyethylene fibres.
Karbhari and Strassler found that the toughness of fibre-reinforced dental materials depends on the type and orientation of the fibre used. Their report, available at the Dental Materials website, shows that braided polyethylene fibres performed the best, boosting toughness by up to 433 percent compared to the composite alone.
Many of the strength and durability tests reported in the paper are not currently required by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which regulates dental composites as class II prescription devices. The agency requires eight minimum tests plus biocompatibility tests to ensure that dental composites are safe and nontoxic.
“Fibre-reinforced composites are now widely used in the aerospace and automotive industries and the experience we’ve gained in these applications can be applied in a more rigorous way in dentistry and medicine to tailor performance to exacting requirements,” said Karbhari. Dentists began using particle filled composites 10 years ago as an alternative to ceramics and mercury-containing metal amalgams. Strassler selected three commercially available fibre-reinforced composites for analysis.
“Many reinforcing fibres can add strength and toughness to dental composites,” Karbhari said, “but if they are improperly aligned they could actually accelerate damage to existing teeth.”
“What’s been missing until now is a rigorous, reproducible way to test the durability and resistance to breakage for these materials,” Strassler said. “Makers of fibre-reinforced dental composites need a much better understanding of how their products actually perform as part of a restoration, crown, or bridge, and t his study provides an analytical standard with which all composites should be evaluated in the future.”
The three products tested were a 3-millimeter-wide ribbon of unidirectional glass fibres, a 3-millimeter-wide ribbon of polyethylene fibres woven in a figure-8 stop-stitch leno-weave, and a 4-millimeter wide ribbon of polyethylene fibres woven in a biaxial braid. The resistance to breakage and various measures of toughness of the three preparations were compared to the dental composite alone.
“All three fibre fabrics dramatically increased the durability and strength of the dental composite, but the polyethylene fibres braided in a biaxial ribbon performed best,” said Karbhari. “The tests required by the FDA indicate that fibre-reinforced composites are safe, but those tests are only partially informative. Our analyses show that we can optimize these materials to match and improve performance of teeth, for greater durability, toughness, and resistance to breakage.”
For more information visit: