Composites World / NetComposites

Connecting you to the composites industry


NetComposites Ltd has transferred the rights and ownership of this website to Gardner Business Media Inc.

On 1st January 2020, NetComposites' media assets including, newsletters and conferences were transferred to Composites World (Gardner Business Media).

This site is no longer being updated. Please direct all enquiries to

For further details see our joint press release.

Composite Door Hardware Module on Lancia Ypsilon

  • Thursday, 27th October 2005
  • Reading time: about 3 minutes

A new composite integrated door hardware module has been produced by the Ranger Group for Lancia’s Ypsilon subcompact passenger car

The module is claimed to meet all European side-impact and hip-protection requirements with no foam pad, injection molded inlay, or other carrier reinforcement. Additionally, Lancia was able to use a minimized steel bar in the door’s outer skin. The module provides intrusion protection through clever design and high-tech, glass-mat thermoplastic composites from Quadrant Plastic Composites.

All automakers must meet intrusion-protection standards for the passenger or driver. But in Europe, there is also an additional hip-protection requirement to meet. Since there was no easy way to integrate this function into existing door module designs, a separate component – either a foam pad or injection-molded inlay – had to be installed. Ironically, this step added both weight and components – two of the features that door hardware modules were designed to reduce.

To meet its performance requirements, Ranger Group worked in partnership with Quadrant Plastic Composites to determine the best material for this new application. First, all candidate materials were subjected to a series of standard small-scale laboratory tests to measure compression, tensile, and impact properties. Top-performing candidates were then subjected to a series of rigorous crash tests on full-size molded door modules loaded on a 912-kg sled at room temperature. Both a side-impact test (with a 200-mm UTAC pole and speeds increasing from 0.92-1.47 m/s penetration rates until part failure/breakage) and a secondary hip-impact test (with 220×220-mm flat impactor and speeds increasing from 1.62- 1.78 m/s until part breakage) were conducted to assess crash worthiness of different materials in the module’s design. Improvements to the clamping design allowed steel-like deformations to be approximated with plastic composites.

Use of a limited rotating steel bracket allowed for initial deformations with low stress to the part. All tests were videotaped. Results are presented in the table to the right. Careful comparison of energy absorption at break revealed that at 400 J and 0.92 m/s penetration, the G-LFT grade absorbed just 120 J of energy before breaking in half, whereas the D-LFT grade absorbed 250 J at break, also splitting in two. The baseline classic GMT grade with 40% glass absorbed 800 J and did not break due to the consistent distribution of its much longer glass fibers. The best-performing grade was the combination layering GMTex high-impact, textilereinforced composite in the middle, surrounded by top and bottom layers of classic GMT with 40% chopped glass. The part molded from this materal absorbed 1,000 J of energy at the test’s most difficult speed of 1.48 m/s and 1,000 J of energy without breakage.

The same materials were also subjected to the hip-impact test (with flat impactor and speeds ranging from 1.62 -1.78 m/s, also at RT). Results were as follows: The G-LFT part at 900 J of impact energy absorbed 450 J; the D-LFT part at the same test conditions absorbed 500 J ; the classic GMT part at 1200 J absorbed 900 J; and the Classic GMT / GMTex part at a more severe +/-45° impact angle and 1440 J of impacting energy absorbed 1300 J. The hip pad on both LFT parts shattered into sharp pieces, whereas it remained intact for both the GMT and GMT / GMTex parts. The classic GMT grade with 40% chopped glass was selected by Ranger Group for the final part. It provided the best combination of performance and cost for the part design without being overengineered.

For more information visit:

Share this article


More News

Comments (0)

Leave your comment