08 January 2007
08 January 2007
Laboratory experiments with carbon nanotubes show significant potential for dispersal in aquatic environments, especially when natural organic materials are present.
Georgia Tech researchers Hoon Hyung, right, and Jaehong Kim found that carbon nanotubes mixed with natural organic matter in water are more likely to be transported in the environment.
When mixed with natural organic matter in water from the Suwannee River - a relatively unpolluted waterway that originates in southern Georgia - multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) remain suspended for more than a month, making them more likely to be transported in the environment, according to research led by the Georgia Institute of Technology.
“We found that natural organic matter, or NOM as we call it, was efficient at suspending the nanotubes in water,” said Jaehong Kim, an assistant professor in the Georgia Tech School of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
The research will be published in the January issue of the American Chemical Society journal Environmental Science & Technology. Kim is the senior author and conducted the research with Professor Joseph Hughes, graduate student Hoon Hyung, both at Georgia Tech, and postdoctoral researcher John Fortner from Georgia Tech and Rice University. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency funded the research.
“We don’t know for certain why NOM is so efficient at suspending these nanotubes in the laboratory,” Kim said. “We think NOM has some chemical characteristics that promote adhesion to the nanotubes more than to some surfactants. We are now studying this further.”
In the lab, Kim and his colleagues compared the interactions of various concentrations of MWNTs with different aqueous environments - organic-free water, water containing a 1 percent solution of the surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), water containing a commercially available sample of Suwannee River NOM and an actual sample of Suwannee River water from the same location as the commercially available preparation. They agitated each sample for one hour and then let it sit for up to one month.
The researchers then used transmission electron microscopy (TEM), measurements of opacity and turbidity, and other analyses to determine the behavior of MWNTs in these environments.
In light of the findings, Kim and his colleagues have expanded their research to other nanomaterials, including single-walled carbon nanotubes and C60, the so-called “buckyball” molecules in the same family as carbon nanotubes. They are also experimenting with other NOM sources and studying different mixing conditions. “We are getting some interesting results, though our findings are still preliminary,” Kim noted.
While researchers explore applications of nanomaterials and industry nears commercial manufacture of these novel products, it’s essential for scientists and engineers to study the materials’ potential environmental impact, Kim added.
“Natural organic matter is heterogeneous,” he explained. “It’s a complex mixture made from plants and microorganisms, and it’s largely undefined and variable depending on the source. So we have to continue to study nanomaterial transport in the lab using various NOM sources to try to better understand their potential interaction in the natural environment.”
In related research, Kim’s research team is studying various other aspects of the fate of nanomaterials in water—including photochemical and chemical reactions of C60 colloidal aggregates—with the ultimate goal of understanding the environmental implications of nanotechnology.