Looking for our consultancy, conferencing, training or innovation services? Visit netcompositesenterprise.com

NetComposites Now
Thermaco

IPS Structural Adhesives Conclude Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against Mayer and Mayer Handels

29 November 2016

IPS Structural Adhesives Conclude Trademark Infringement Lawsuit Against Mayer and Mayer Handels

IPS Structural Adhesives has successfully concluded its lawsuit against Mayer & Mayer Handels, following a mostly favourable judgment in the Austrian courts.

According to IPS, the Commercial Court in Vienna, Austria, found an infringement of IPS' EUTM 9 698 762 SCIGRIP and granted its application for injunction, accounting, disclosing the distribution channels of the infringing goods and publication of judgment. It says that only the application for destruction of the remaining infringing products was dismissed, because there was no proof that Mayer & Mayer still possessed such goods at the end of the first instance proceedings.   

The lawsuit was initiated in March 2014 after IPS became aware that Mayer & Mayer, a former customer of IPS, was engaged in ongoing sales of SCIGRIP adhesives in Europe. However, there were customer complaints about these SCIGRIP adhesives sold by Mayer & Mayer. IPS explains that, due to the cooperation of one of these customers with IPS, it was possible to file the lawsuit against Mayer & Mayer. In its judgment the Commercial Court in Vienna came to the conclusion that Mayer & Mayer either used a wrong, a counterfeit or an expired original adhesive component for its deliveries to this customer under the SCIGRIP brand. Thus, the Commercial Court in Vienna ruled mostly in favour of IPS on 14 July 2015. Mayer & Mayer’s subsequent appeals against the judgment to the Higher Regional Court of Vienna (Oberlandesgericht Wien) and to the Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof) were not successful so that the Commercial Court's judgment became final in June 2016.

As the next step, IPS will seek financial compensation from Mayer & Mayer for the infringement of its SCIGRIP trademark.

“We are extremely pleased with this court judgment. SCIGRIP is understandably proud of its brand and formulations and will always protect them as well as our customers in cases like this,” comments John Reeves, President, SCIGRIP Adhesives.


Photo provided by Scigrip





comments powered by Disqus

Related / You might like...

Airbus Selects Hexcel as Supplier for H160 Helicopter

Hexcel will extend its 40-year partnership with Airbus Helicopters by supplying composite materials for the new H160 helicopter.

Custom Composites Sponsors Team GB Sailors

Custom Composites has announced sponsorship of Olympic hopefuls Team Lloyd Williams-Alloway, continuing a relationship with Team GB sailors that has resulted in gold medals in each of the two last summer games.

Dilutec Signs Distribution Agreement with Percilglass

Dilutec has signed an agreement with Percilglass for exclusive distribution of its gel-coat products in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.